{"id":13002,"date":"2023-12-21T02:25:14","date_gmt":"2023-12-21T01:25:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ceoinfluencers.com\/?p=13002"},"modified":"2023-12-21T02:25:14","modified_gmt":"2023-12-21T01:25:14","slug":"did-mark-zuckerberg-really-screw-eduardo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ceoinfluencers.com\/did-mark-zuckerberg-really-screw-eduardo\/","title":{"rendered":"Did Mark Zuckerberg Really Screw Eduardo"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Background<\/h2>\n

Mark Zuckerberg and Eduardo Saverin became good friends while studying at Harvard University.In 2004, the two young entrepreneurs, along with a few other friends, founded Facebook.Saverin was the business brains behind the venture, providing international experience and financial acumen, while Zuckerberg was the genius behind the computer code that made the world’s largest-ever social networking platform possible.As co-founders of Facebook, the two friends each owned a sizeable stake in their newly minted creation—one that was to earn them both billions. However, acrimony between the two soon developed and the result became a legal battle in the courts that pitted the two influential and powerful figures against each other. <\/p>\n

Definitive Timeline of Events<\/h2>\n

In the summer of 2004, Zuckerberg and Saverin signed a partnership agreement that gave Saverin a 30% share of Facebook and made him the businessman behind the venture.Things were going smoothly and they even officially incorporated with the idea of taking Facebook to the next level.They appointed themselves as co-presidents and Zuckerberg focused on the development of the site while Saverin was in charge of the business and finance side of the operation.But their dream was to be short-lived, as shortly afterward Zuckerberg struck a deal with the venture capital firm Accel Investors.This deal saw him take control of the company in exchange for a 12% stake.As a result of the deal, Saverin’s stake was reduced from 30% to under 10%.<\/p>\n

The Court Battle<\/h2>\n

The legality of the investors deal was called into question, and Saverin took Zuckerberg and Facebook to court, claiming that his rights had been disregarded.The trial was broadcast on all media outlets and lurid details emerged about machinations and underhand tactics conducted by Zuckerberg, painting the young billionaire in a negative light.The legal battle was long and complex, but eventually it went in favour of Zuckerberg, who savoured a victory which preserved his control of the firm, while also increasing his own personal stake further.<\/p>\n

Unclear Reasons For Dispute<\/h2>\n

The reasons behind the dispute remain unclear.Were money, power, and control at the center of the conflict, or were the two friends looking to gain a greater measure of control over the new business they had created out of thin air?It is difficult to ascertain the exact underlying reasons for their disagreement, as the two clearly had varying visions for how the firm should move forward.<\/p>\n

Post Settlement Impact<\/h2>\n