{"id":15843,"date":"2024-01-07T07:45:10","date_gmt":"2024-01-07T06:45:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ceoinfluencers.com\/?p=15843"},"modified":"2024-01-07T07:45:10","modified_gmt":"2024-01-07T06:45:10","slug":"is-tesla-feature-landing-elon-musk-in-hot-water","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ceoinfluencers.com\/is-tesla-feature-landing-elon-musk-in-hot-water\/","title":{"rendered":"Is Tesla Feature Landing Elon Musk In Hot Water"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Background Information and Insights<\/h2>\n

Tesla is a leading American electric car manufacturer founded by Elon Musk in 2003. The company is well-known for its innovative electric cars, as well as its autopilot driving feature – a feature which has recently landed Musk in hot water. The main controversy involves the autonomy of the autopilot feature and its implications for the safety of drivers and passengers relying on the feature.
\nTesla’s Autopilot feature is a driver-assistance system designed to be used in combination with active and alert driver supervision. This system is meant to reduce the likelihood of driver error, the primary cause of motor vehicle crashes. But because it is a semi-autonomous system, the onus is still placed on the driver to maintain control of the vehicle, despite the system being in place.
\nCritics of Tesla’s Autopilot feature point to several fatal crashes that have occurred in which the driver was using the Autopilot system. However, it is important to note that these incidents have taken place within a fairly large statistical sample, meaning that the Autopilot has operated more safely than a human driver in the majority of cases. This leads to the question of whether the Autopilot system, in of itself, has been responsible for the injuries and fatalities, or rather if there are other factors that need to be considered, such as misusing the system or relying too heavily on it.<\/p>\n

Data and Perspectives from Experts<\/h2>\n

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued a report in which they found that the number of fatalities involving Tesla vehicles per mile travelled was “30% lower than fatal crashes involving vehicles with conventional technologies”. The same report also praised Tesla’s Autopilot feature for its ability to adjust steering to avoid obstacles, such as parked cars and pedestrians.
\nIt is no surprise then that a number of experts in the field have spoken favorably of Autopilot’s potential. Chris Urmson, an Artificial Intelligence expert and former head of Google’s self-driving car program, opined that Tesla’s Autopilot system “has the potential to be among the safest cars on the road”. By adapting digital safety systems to car ownership, Tesla is “incorporating the kind of features that will save lives,” according to Urmson.
\nOn the other hand, some experts are calling for more oversight and stricter regulations regarding autonomous driving features. Belal Aqiqi, a professor of transportation engineering at the University of Southern California, pointed to the need for increased safety regulation in the autonomous vehicle industry. Aqiqi argued “There are technologies that need to be additional measures in place to ensure they are operated in accordance with safety standards.”<\/p>\n

Legal Implications<\/h2>\n

The Autopilot system has come under scrutiny in relation to potential legal implications. Paul J. Luckman, a professor of law and ethics at Northwestern University, believes that Tesla’s Autopilot should be subject to the same safety regulations that apply to other vehicular technologies. He further argued that “drivers of Tesla’s Autopilot system should not be able to completely surrender control of the vehicle or place their trust in a system that has not been thoroughly investigated and tested.”
\nIn light of these legal implications, there is debate about whether Musk is liable for the use of the Autopilot feature. While some argue that he should be held responsible for the deaths related to crashes where the Autopilot feature was involved, others believe that the drivers should bear the liability due to the misuse of the system. Elon Musk has defended Tesla’s Autopilot feature, arguing that it should be used “as the name implies, with hands on the wheel” and that it is “incredibly sad” when it is not used correctly. <\/p>\n

Consumer Psychology<\/h2>\n

Tesla, as well as other manufacturers, has been marketing Autopilot as “self-driving,” which may be viewed as deceiving to some consumers who may believe they can rely on the system to do the driving, when in fact they still need to maintain control of the vehicle while it is in use. This has prompted questions about Tesla’s responsibility to educate consumers on the limitations of Autopilot and how to safely operate the feature.
\nFrom a consumer psychology perspective, many potential buyers of self-driving cars are expecting an entirely autonomous system. As the technology continues to evolve, it is essential that companies work with manufacturers to clarify the capabilities of their systems and communicate this information to the customer.
\nThe CEO of the automotive safety software company Movimento, Tom Dougherty, believes there has been a lack of “proactive communication” from Tesla in regards to the limitations of Autopilot. Dougherty further argued that “It’s not sufficient for Tesla to provide their users with a brief explanation of the Autopilot features, drivers must understand specifically when and how to use the various functions, such as automated cruise control, steering assistance and lane keeping.”<\/p>\n

Elon Musk’s Online Behavior<\/h2>\n